Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 2022 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2239879

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of postponed care attributed to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic lockdowns on visual acuity and the number of anti-VEGF injections in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study of consecutive RVO patients previously treated with anti-VEGF injections, which compared data from pre- (2019) and during (2020) COVID-19 lockdown period. RESULTS: A total of 814 RVO patients with a mean age of 72.8 years met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 439 patients were assessed in 2019 and 375 in 2020. There was no significant difference between the COVID-19 and pre-COVID-19 period in terms of baseline and final BCVA (p = 0.7 and 0.9 respectively), but there was a significantly reduced mean number of anti-VEGF injections during the COVID-19 period (5.0 and. 5.9 respectively, p < 0.01), with a constant lower ratio of injections per patient. A noticeable decline was found during March-May (p < 0.01) in 2020. Baseline BCVA (0.69, p < 0.01) and the number of injections (- 0.01, p = 0.01) were predictors of final BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of RVO patients, during 2020 lockdowns imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant reduction in the annual number of anti-VEGF injections was noted. The postponed care did not result in a significant impact on the final BCVA. Baseline BCVA and the number of annual injections serve as predictors for final BCVA in RVO patients.

2.
J Clin Med ; 12(4)2023 Feb 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2230394

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We report a case of a patient with a bilateral branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) 24 h after a booster vaccination with the mRNA-1237 vaccine. OBSERVATIONS: Fluorescein angiography, performed at three weeks follow-up, showed vascular leakage and blockage, corresponding to hemorrhage areas associated with ischemic areas in the macula and along the arcades involved in the occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: The patient was scheduled for urgent injections of intravitreal ranibizumab and laser photocoagulation of the ischemic areas. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case described of concomitant bilateral RVO after COVID-19 vaccination. The rapid onset of the side effects in a patient with multiple risk factors for thrombotic events suggests that vulnerable microvascular conditions require detailed investigations before administration of a COVID-19 vaccine.

3.
Ophthalmol Ther ; 11(1): 453-458, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1559807

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Published data on possible ocular adverse events potentially associated with vaccination with the SARS-Cov-2 mRNA-1237 vaccine are scarce. In this report, we describe the case of a patient who had a hemispheric retinal vein occlusion potentially associated with being vaccinated with the second dose of the SARS-Cov-2 mRNA-1237 vaccine. METHODS: Case report including a discussion on multimodal imaging. RESULTS: A 74-year-old woman presented with painless vision loss in the right eye experienced 48 hours after receiving a second dose of the mRNA-1237 vaccine. The patient was receiving oral anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation. Her best-corrected visual acuity (VA) was 20/32, and fundus examination showed venous congestion and widespread blot haemorrhages in the inferior quadrants. Based on multimodal imaging evaluation, the diagnosis of hemispheric retinal vein occlusion was made. Due to the development of cystoid macular oedema with intraretinal fluid and the decline in VA, the patient was treated with two injections of intravitreal ranibizumab, leading to functional improvement and regression of oedema. CONCLUSIONS: We report a case with retinal vein occlusion 48 hours after vaccination with the SARS-Cov-2 mRNA-1237 vaccine; however, the relationship between these two events remains unclear. Further research is warranted to better understand the potential link between retinal thrombotic events and vaccination.

4.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 576275, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1004682

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on anti-VEGF treatment in ophthalmology patients in a single hospital in northern China. A total of 93 anti-VEGF injections were administered to 85 eyes of 72 patients at The China Medical University First Hospital Department of Ophthalmology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared to the same period in 2019, the number of injections decreased by 70%. Fifty-nine eyes of 46 patients were receiving 3+PRN anti-VEGF treatment prior to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic; all of these patients experienced treatment interruptions due to COVID-19-associated reasons. Anatomic and functional outcomes suggest that patients with anti-VEGF treatment interruptions are at risk for severe adverse visual sequelae. Moreover, deferred anti-VEGF treatment due to patient-related or department-related reasons during the COVID-19 pandemic may result in poor visual outcomes for new patients. Our results suggest that COVID-19 has had a significant negative effect on anti-VEGF treatment in ophthalmology patients. Detailed guidance from global experts in ophthalmology is highly sought after in these challenging circumstances.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL